Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carruthers- RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Antwan M Carruthers, Eye Keyla M Carruthers Washington and Antwan M Carruthers Washington
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau and K Gann
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORTEH v. MARION COURT JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv02146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. DORTCH
Defendant:
P. SONNENBERG, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dortch v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Michael Dortch
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Galipeau, Leggings and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38677
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW K GANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Neal et al
as 3:2016cv00838
Plaintiff:
Oasia Barnes
Defendant:
Mr Ron Neal, Mr K Gann, Mr Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jasper Frazier
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Indiana State Prison, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIS Financial Services, Inc. v. Gann
as 6:2009cv00762
Counter Defendant:
CIS Financial Services, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, CIS Financial Services, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, CIS Financial Services, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Terry K Gann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eri - Petition for removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Gann v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2007cv01564
Plaintiff:
Joyce K. Gann
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
