Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv03657
Plaintiff:
One World Technologies, Inc. and K Mart Corporation
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC v. Manley Toys Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03544
Plaintiff:
Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC
Defendant:
Manley Toys Limited, Toy Quest Limited and K Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glaeser v. K Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Andrew Glaeser
Defendant:
K Mart Corporation , Sears Holdings Long-Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. K-MART PHARMACY #7243
as 1:2013cv02059
Defendant:
K-MART PHARMACY #7243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Talmon Hegwood, Jr. v. City of Berwyn, et al
as 11-3859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TALMON HEGWOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BERWYN, JOSEPH PETERSON, K-MART DEPARTMENT STORE and others
WIMBERLY et al v. INVENT HELP et al
as 1:2010cv00930
Defendant:
CHRIS CARMAN, CVS, GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
AMANDA COLLINS, LILITH HUTCHENSON, JILL A. WIMBERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
DRENGACS v. K-MART CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
DOYNE DRENGACS
Defendant:
K-MART CORPORATION and K-MART CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
