Cases 1 - 10 of 2,064
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ELLIS v. FONSECA et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
FONSECA, CHAD EVANS, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVEY v. JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEAVELL, K. KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
