Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 113
United States of America v. $9,482.89 in U.S. Currency Seized From Bank of America, Acct #XXXXXXX4319 et al
as 3:2011cv00923
Defendant: $11,458.05 In U.S. Currency Seized From Bank of America, ACCT #XXXXXXX4092, $9,482.89 in U.S. Currency Seized From Bank of America, Acct #XXXXXXX4319, Apple I-Phone Model 326B Vehicle and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $5,253.00 United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv06335
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $5,253.00 United States Currency, 6 Money Orders having a total value of $2,406.00 United States Currency, 6 Bank Checks having a total value of $3,335.00 United States Currency and others
Claimant: D&K America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States Of America v. V&K Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03746
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: V&K Pharmacy, Inc., Barat Patel , Reddy Kolli and others
Cross_claimant: Barat Patel
Cross_defendant: Barat Patel , Reddy Kolli, Vanda Sheth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. $17,811,379.02 Funds Seized as Follows: et al
as 3:2011cv01394
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,811,379.02 Funds Seized as Follows, A). $60,240.58 Funds Seized From, B). $2,964,085.93 Funds Seized from and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Weaver v. Strotheide We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00574
Plaintiff: Ralph Paul Weaver, Jr.
Defendant: David K. Strotheide
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $21,239.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2010cv00993
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $21,239.00 in United States Currency, $12,321.47 Seized From M&T bank, Account No. 9850575664 in the Name of Shamsan Fadel and $8,145.74 Seized From First Niagara Bank,k Account No. 7900279261 in the Name of Shamsan Fadel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 913 Mackville Road, Hardwick, Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00293
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 913 Mackville Road, Hardwick, Vermont, Contents in Account No. 10001055 at Merchants Bank, Contents in Account No. 10105807 at Merchants Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce et al
as 2:2010cv01853
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce, $315,817.06 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6516, held in the name of Anaya Trading Solution, $1,905.81 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6834, held in the name of Macquairie Solutions, LL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 438/100 pound bags, more or less, of an article of food labeled in part: et al
as 1:2010cv03434
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 438/100 pound bags, more or less, of an article of food labeled in part: and all other articles of food (excluding meat and poultry products) in various sizes and types of containers (excluding metal and glass containers) that are located anywhere on the premises of Sun Hong K
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 334
VJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Strotheide
as 1:2010cv00334
Plaintiff: VJ Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: David K. Strotheide
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?