Cases 81 - 90 of 5,183
US v. Rodriguez-Maldonado
as 23-1997
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RODRIGUEZ-MALDONADO, a/k/a Michael Rodriguez-Maldonado
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Baskerville Rozario v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12905
Plaintiff:
Geneva K. Baskerville Rozario
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Camacho-Duran
as 23-1977
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIDEL CAMACHO-DURAN, a/k/a El Flaco
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Brown-Allen et al v. DeFelice Management
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Latoya Brown-Allen and Andrew K. Harding
Defendant:
DeFelice Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wittenberg v. Flagstar Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wittenberg and Arthur of the Wittenberg Family
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A., James K. Ciroli, Catherine V. Eastwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1956
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1957
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
