Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Muqit v. ofc Rivera et al
as 0:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
ofc Rivera, Sgt Salazor, Sgt. Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barnes et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Barnes , David A. Banks , Demetrius K. Harper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, C.R. Goetz, C.R. (I) Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustavo Alvarez v. State of California, et al
as 17-15062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
Zaiza v. Tamplen et al
as 2:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
Jose R Zaiza
Defendant:
D. Tamplen, S. Perry, D. Peddicord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Foulk, et al.
as 2:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez
Defendant:
F. Foulk, S.L. Chapman, M. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Prater et al
as 2:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
C. Prater, D. Simpson, J. L. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Sader et al
as 2:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Ernest Miller
Defendant:
S. Sader, C. Prater, K. Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Burgett et al
as 2:2009cv03218
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
J. Burgett, K. Harper, R. Blanthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv01028
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Tom Felker, M.D. McDonald, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
