Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Persaud v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Christopher Persaud
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, James O. Payne, Sarah Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bang-er Shia v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
as 17-1370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANG-ER SHIA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, MICHELLE K. LEE, Director of the USPTO, SARAH HARRIS, Office of General Counsel for USPTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robert Payne v. Michelle Lee
as 16-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, RINALDI RADA, United States Patent and Trademark Office, SARAH MONFELDT, United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Shia v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2016cv01051
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Michelle K. Lee, Sarah Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Bang-er Shia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
