Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clark v. Johnson-Hurst et al
as 2:2018cv02034
Plaintiff:
Tony Terell Clark
Defendant:
Tiffany D Johnson-Hurst, Robert K O'Reilly, City of Champaign Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Clair v. Turck et al
as 2:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis-Clair
Defendant:
CO Turck , C Francois, K O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. White et al
as 1:2016cv10433
Plaintiff:
Duane Edwards
Defendant:
Stephen D. White, James W. Glasglow, Jeff Tomczack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Large v. Wachtl et al
as 1:2015cv05193
Plaintiff:
Alan K. O'Large
Defendant:
Bradley Wachtl, Richard Trafton, RJ Knezevich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Reiley v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02674
Plaintiff:
Rory K O'Reiley
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'NEAL v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00318
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MELISSA K. O'NEAL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
El v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
Dontia Edwards El
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Pat Quinn, Peoria County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bond et al v. Champaign County Sheriff et al
as 2:2011cv02059
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jane Bond , G. O. II , J. O. and others
Defendant:
Dan Walsh , David Coffey , . Ferriman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'SHELL v. CLINE et al
as 1:2010cv01660
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. CLINE and DAN HACKLER
Plaintiff:
GLORIA K. O'SHELL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
