Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Hopkins v. Young
as 1:2009cv00901
Petitioner:
Andre Fidel Hopkins
Respondent:
S. K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blount v. Young
as 2:2009cv00331
Petitioner:
Frank A. Blount
Respondent:
S. K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ocan-Parada v. Young
as 3:2009cv00087
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Ocan-Parada
Respondent:
S. K. Young
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Hager
as 8:2008cv03244
Plaintiff:
Robert S. K. Young
Defendant:
Michael W. Hager
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Herdt v. Young et al
as 7:2008cv00532
Petitioner:
Michael J. Herdt
Respondent:
Stanley K. Young, The State of Virginia, Timothy M. Kaine and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dorcus v. Young
as 7:2008cv00507
Petitioner:
Edward F. Dorcus, Jr.
Respondent:
S. K. Young
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bird v. Young
as 7:2008cv00392
Petitioner:
Chester L. Bird
Respondent:
Stanley K. Young
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Trujillo v. Johnson et al
as 7:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jesse Trujillo
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, L. W. Huffman, S. K. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Angelone
as 06-6740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELTON LEE WILLIAMS
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD J. ANGELONE, in his individual and official capacity, GENE M. JOHNSON, H. R. POWELL, Warden, Southampton Correctional Center and others
Young v. New Haven Advocate
as 01-2340
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STANLEY K. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellant:
NEW HAVEN ADVOCATE, GAIL THOMPSON, CAMILLE JACKSON and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. LAWLOR, CAROLYN NAH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Amicus Curiae:
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
