Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Devin Wade v. Elena Kagan
as 5:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Elena Kagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kagan v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv04886
Plaintiff:
Victor Kagan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rune Kraft v. Valerie Fairbank, et al
as 23-16048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT
Defendant / Appellee:
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, M MARGARET MCKEOWN, JOHN F WALTER and others
Laura Duffy v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 2:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
Laura Duffy
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberto, Clarence Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kraft v. Fairbank et al
as 2:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Valerie Baker Fairbank, M Margaret McKeown, John F Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2021cv07922
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Genius Fund I ABC, LLC v. Gary I. Shinder et al
as 2:2021cv03765
Defendant:
Gary I. Shinder, Joseph Ohayon, Evan Kagan and others
Plaintiff:
Genius Fund I ABC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
