Cases 1 - 10 of 113
A.H. v. Montogmery County Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01401
Defendant:
Dan Thorpe, Administrator Katie Pape, Warren County Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
A.H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mathis V. FCA US LLC
as 4:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Katie Ann Mathis
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McSean v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Harris
as 4:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Katie Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. St. Charles County et al
as 4:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kensinger v. Cox South et al
as 6:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
Christine Louise Kensinger
Defendant:
Cox South, Ferrell Duncan Clinic, Alex Andrew Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Hook v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Katie Hook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McSean v. Bullock et al
as 4:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Jamie Crump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
