Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Huang et al v. Gel Factory, Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv03817
Plaintiff:
Ren Zhe Jin, Ri Yuan and Yunzhe Huang
Defendant:
Gel Factory, Corp., Kay Kim, Tammy Jae Eun Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CHUANG et al v. ROSENSKI et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CHUANG and KAY KIM
Defendant:
KAREN FREEMAN-WILSON, W OLIVER, DONALD W ROSENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kay Kim v. Laura Ritter
as 12-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAY KIM
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA RITTER
KIM v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2009cv01221
Petitioner:
KAY KIM
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kay Kim v. George Parker, et al
as 09-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAY KIM
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE F. PARKER, JUDITH S. PROFFITT, Special Judge and INDIANA UNIVERSITY
KIM v. PARKER, M.D. et al
as 1:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
KAY KIM
Defendant:
GEORGE F. PARKER, M.D., JUDITH S. PROFFITT and INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mara Hoffman, Inc. v. Kim et al
as 1:2009cv05059
Plaintiff:
Mara Hoffman, Inc. and Mara Hoffman, Inc.
Defendant:
Jang Y. Kim, Kay Kim and Bizz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
