Cases 111 - 120 of 315
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00229
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and J. SHAW
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2017cv00092
Defendant:
S. BECKER, ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JANE DOE(S), JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKINGBOTTOM v. BUTTS, ET AL
as 1:2016cv03423
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., HIPPEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE HICKINGBOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMPLE v GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03412
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, MS. FRENCH, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS F SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sample v GEO Group Inc The et al
as 2:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc The, New Castle Correctional Facility, Keith Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANLEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv03292
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RILEY et al v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2016cv03243
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, ADAM DEMING and others
Plaintiff:
CLINTON RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODRING v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv03222
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
BRIAN WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02625
Petitioner:
LUCAS BAILEY
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
