Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jason Hurst v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 13-6
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON WAYNE HURST
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
William Barnes v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 13-5
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEROY BARNES
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Elrico Fowler v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 13-4
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELRICO DARNELL FOWLER
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
THOMPSON v. LASSITER
as 1:2013cv00196
Petitioner:
JOHN HENRY THOMPSON
Respondent:
KENNETH E. LASSITER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Errol Moses v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 13-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERROL DUKE MOSES
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Burke v. Lassiter
as 5:2012cv00137
Petitioner:
Rayford Lewis Burke
Respondent:
Kenneth E. Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Burr v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 12-4
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOHN EDWARD BURR
Respondent - Appellant:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Linwood Forte v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 12-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINWOOD EARL FORTE
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and ROY COOPER, Attorney General for the State of North Carolina
Randy Atkins v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 12-1
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY LYNN ATKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Alden Harden v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 11-8
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALDEN JEROME HARDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and ROY COOPER, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
