Cases 41 - 50 of 165
Kenneth Barbour v. Non-Ex Felon Voting Right
as 10-7733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
NON-EX FELON VOTING RIGHTS, LIVE ANIMAL DISPLAYS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Barbour v. Private Employers Using Prison
as 10-7653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
PRIVATE EMPLOYERS USING PRISONS AND MENTAL FACILITY WARD LABOR
Barbour v. United States Government et al
as 4:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
United States Government, Attorney General and Public Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Barbour v. Attainder Stanford, et al
as 10-17614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTAINDER STANFORD, GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS, SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Religion et al
as 10-7605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
RELIGION, CULTS and CITIZENS
Kenneth Barbour v. Public Smoking Ordinance
as 10-7590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR, a/k/a Kent Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLIC BUILDING NO SMOKING ORDINANCES & LAWS
Barbour v. Private Employers Using Prison and Mental Facility Ward Labor
as 2:2010cv00545
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Private Employers Using Prison and Mental Facility Ward Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. VA Dept. of Corr.
as 1:2010cv00841
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
VA Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Barbour v. Taxe
as 10-7443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TAXES, VIRGINIA DEPT. OF CORR. OFFENDER TRUST SYSTEM, BRYAN WATSON and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Tracy Ray
as 10-7439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY RAY, GENE M. JOHNSON and PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE CAMERA'S - IOP 851 ROSP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
