Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MILES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ueding v. Border et al
as 1:2018cv00778
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Miles Ueding
Defendant:
Charles Border, Robert L. Lowrey and Robert King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ueding v. El Paso County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2017cv01365
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Miles Ueding
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff's Office and Correctional Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Miles v. Bank of America NA et al
as 3:2013cv02775
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kenneth Miles
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Countrywide KB Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
George Jenkins, Jr. v. Kenneth Miles, Jr., et al
as 13-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE JENKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH MILES, JR., Chicago Police Officer and MICHELLE DZIELAK, also the City of Chicago, officially and individually
Miles v. Bank of America NA et al
as 3:2013cv00779
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Countrywide KB Home Loans and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kenneth Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kenneth Miles v. Raymark Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-00781
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Miles
Defendant:
Raymark Industries, Inc
Miles v. Ingleheart et al
as 5:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Miles
Defendant:
Jim Ingleheart, Michael Fuller and David Raper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
