Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jordan v. Turbine Support International LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
Kaleigh Jordan
Defendant:
Turbine Support International LLC , Aviation Repair Technologies LLC , Joe Mras and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Sandy Krout v. Lee Goemmer, et al
as 08-2815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sandy Krout, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Joe Rylee, deceased, andsurvivors other
Defendant - Appellant:
Lee Goemmer, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Bobby Stevens, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Keith Spears, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville and others
Defendant:
Luke Sawdy, individually, Supervisor of Jail for Pope County, Chris Ketcherside, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas, Chris Johnston, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas and others
Sandy Krout v. Luke Sawdy, et al
as 08-2781
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sandy Krout, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Joe Rylee, deceased, andsurvivors other
Defendant:
Lee Goemmer, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Bobby Stevens, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Keith Spears, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luke Sawdy, individually, Supervisor of Jail for Pope County, Chris Ketcherside, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas, Chris Johnston, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
