Cases
Owens v. Samuel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv05045
Plaintiff: Tommy Owens
Defendant: Major Randall Denzer, Greg Tabor, Major Greg Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIDMARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11616
Plaintiff: KEVIN LUKE WIDMARK
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barron v. Luke
as 1:2018cv02992
Plaintiff: Darrion Barron
Defendant: Kevin Luke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00277
Plaintiff: Kevin Luke Christopher Anderson
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Karas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15930
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: MARIA MARSHALL, GERI MAXWELL, WAYNE MARSHALL and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Anderson v. Grapevine et al
as 2:2014cv00949
Plaintiff: Kevin Luke Christopher Anderson
Defendant: Unknown Grapevine, Unknown McElfresh, Unknown Karas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15930
: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant: BARBARA COCHRAN, KEVIN LUKE, GERI MAXWELL and others
Defendant - Appellee: LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
In Re: National Motor Vehicles Canadian Export, et al.
as 1:2011mc00031

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?