Cases 1 - 10 of 30
R. White v. Jacqueline Seabrooks, et al
as 22-56172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS, PHILIP BROCK and others
R. White v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: R. WHITE, JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS and others
Petitioner:
R. WHITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv05536
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Defendant:
THE NATION OF ISLAM, LOUIS FARRAKHAN, TONY MUHAMMAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. White v. Jacqueline Seabrooks, et al
as 2:2021cv08528
Plaintiff:
R. White
Defendant:
Jacqueline Seabrooks, Gleam Davis, Philip Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonathan VanLoan v. Nation of Islam, et al
as 21-55317
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MCGEE, KENNETH SEMKO, GEOFF RIZZZO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN AMBROSE VANLOAN
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT BIXBY
Jonathan VanLoan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Samuel Lee, Steve Soboroff, Gleam Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanLoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONDOR v. MCKEOWN et al
as 2:2019cv05769
Plaintiff:
JOHN GONDOR
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR OF KEVIN MCKEOWN, DIRECTOR OF DELAWARE COUNTY ADULT PAROLE AND PROBATION and KEVIN MCKEOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan VanLoan v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2019cv00197
Defendant:
Samuel Lee, Gleam Davis, Aurelio Mattucci and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanLoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04439
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McKeown v. 317 Magnone LLC
as 1:2013cv04521
Defendant:
Kevin McKeown
Plaintiff:
317 Magnone LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
