Cases
HAKIM v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv05726
Plaintiff: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Defendant: MICHELLE M. SMITH, ANTHONY BASANTIS and JAMES KOSTOPLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAKIM v. DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Defendant: DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC, ROOSEVELT PARENT LLC, JEFFREY TOLL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC v. NIXON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv16126
Defendant: JOHN & JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 5, GLENDA E. NIXON and KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Plaintiff: DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC
Counter Defendant: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Khakil Abdul Hakim
as 13-1003
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: JOHN R PADOVA
USA v. Khalil Hakim We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4569
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM, a/k/a Anthony Lowery
HAKIM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv07006
Petitioner: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAKIM v. ZICKEFOOSE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04786
Plaintiff: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Defendant: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, K. MYERS, LTD. and A. BOYCE, D.H.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAKIM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009mc00073
Petitioner: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes None
HAKIM v. MILLER et al
as 2:2007mc00143
Plaintiff: KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Defendant: FLOYD MILLER, DAVID KOZLOW and DIANNE BRANNAN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?