Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BAXTER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D. BAXTER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN THOMPSON, MICHAEL MALMISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFRIES v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. JEFFRIES
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. , JOSEPH KOCH, SCOTT MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUNKLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
JASON E. RUNKLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN E. WETZEL , RICHARD S. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RATHY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
GEORGE F. RATHY, SR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, THE CENTRAL OFFICE INMATE DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION COMMITTEE (COIDAC), BRIAN H. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
O'BRIEN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01246
Plaintiff:
ROCKY O'BRIEN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN THOMPSON, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT MANAGER MICHAEL MAHLMEISTER, MAJOR OF THE GUARD DAVID ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LENTZ v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
ERIC LENTZ
Defendant:
MELVIN S. LOCKETT, DR. RUEDA, MICHAEL W. HARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JULIAN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JULIAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD , KATHLEEN ZWIERZYNA , MICHAEL HARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAINTER v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01381
Plaintiff:
RONALD PAINTER
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JEFFREY BEARD, SHARON BURKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
