Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
David Meyers v. Balrus Gernegen
as 23-6988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, Scotland Correctional Institute Acting MCON Unit Manager, MARCUS SCOTT, a/k/a Ronnie Scott, Scotland Correctional Institute MCON Unit Manager, MR. CAPTAIN INGRAM, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
SPRY v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES SPRY
Defendant:
JON DOE, JANE DOE, WAKENDA GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOWERY et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LOWERY, MARIE MCLAUGHLIN, YOLANDA GAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Sergeant Hafeez
as 23-6042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HAFEEZ, SERGEANT HUNT, OFFICER BARNES and others
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03338
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Glenda Jackson, Shana Henderson, Unit Manager Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
