Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12103
Petitioner:
Bruce E King
Respondent:
S Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NOBREGA v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
DOMINGUS NOBREGA
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLAGAN v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
LESLIE COLLAGAN
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF, DEPUTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DESMARAIS v. YORK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
KYLE DESMARAIS
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY JAIL, WILLIAM L KING, JR, CO KENNETH HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOBREGA v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00373
Plaintiff:
DOMINGUS NOBREGA, JOSHUA WALKER, TRAVIS DEWITT and others
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY, YORK COUNTY SHERIFF and SHERIFF WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. YORK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
WILLIAM KING, YORK COUNTY JAIL and OFFICER CUMMERS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Wall
as 1:2019cv00645
Respondent:
A.T. Wall and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Andrew King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALCEDO v. KING et al
as 2:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN J SALCEDO
Defendant:
OFFICER DUBOIS, SARGEANT RONCO, OFFICER STAPLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRESSER v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARON, MARTIN, FEERO and others
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Plaintiff:
JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
