Cases 41 - 50 of 1,625
Samuelson v. King et al
as 1:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Samuelson
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, Rene Hinojosa, Alma Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
Ronald King, Warden Jackson, Warden Vigliate and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenear v. Deputy A. Beal et al
as 4:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Dakari J. Lenear
Defendant:
Deputy A. Beal, Deputy M. Quintanilla, Deputy J. Reinert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. King
as 23-10930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher T. King
Cadena v. King
as 4:2023cv00902
Petitioner:
Michael Cadena
Respondent:
Johnson County Jail and Adam King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Tanner Lance King
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01776
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lumpkin
as 23-50512
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy Joe King
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Albarado v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant:
Brian Collier, David Blackwell, FNU Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dingler v. Dallas County, Texas
as 23-10679
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas County, Texas, Marian Brown, Terrie McVea and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
