Cases 21 - 30 of 208
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner:
Daniel H. King
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nye v. King et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jarad Nye
Defendant:
FNU King, FNU LNU, Tracy LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. King et al
as 5:2022hc02140
Petitioner:
Alex Gonzalez
Respondent:
Malinda L. King and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03304
Plaintiff:
Joseph White
Defendant:
Debra King, Sgt. Regina Williams and Cap. Robert Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Money v. King
as 5:2022hc02132
Petitioner:
Chad Houston Money
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03226
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden M.L. King, Ms. Brown-Strobee, Yvonne Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taffe v. Scott
as 5:2022ct03224
Plaintiff:
Timothy Taffe
Defendant:
C/O Scott, Warden King, Warden Scarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2022ct03117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys at Law, Christopher Venters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
