Cases 31 - 40 of 1,304
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Ahmadi v. King County
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ratib Ahmadi
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Recology King County Inc
as 2:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Recology King County Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nair, et al. v. Toth, et al.
as 23-3682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYAKUMAR SUNDARAN NAIR, RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K NAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX TOTH, PAUL LEE, DJ VYZIS and others
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hopson v. Kings County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joel Hopson
Defendant:
Kings County Jail, A. Lopez, Hanford Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puzas v. King County et al
as 2:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Puzas
Defendant:
King County, City of Bellevue, Arete Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. King County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Norval Lee Jackson
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility and King County Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Kings County Superior Court
as 2:2023cv02447
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Kings County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
