Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bettis-Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2019cv08202
Plaintiff:
Kirell Francis Bettis-Taylor
Defendant:
A. Raschke, Internal Revenue Service and K. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv03051
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, A. RASCHKE and K. GREEN
Plaintiff:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS TRUST, KIRELL F. BETTIS and KIRELL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirell Francis Bettis Trust et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2019cv01342
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Kirell Francis Bettis Trust and Kirell F. Bettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BETTIS v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv02802
Plaintiff:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETTIS v. USA
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Taylor v. Kirell Francis Bettis Trust
as 2:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kirell Taylor
Defendant:
Kirell Francis Bettis Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The People of the State of California et al v Kirell Francis Bettis
as 2:2014cv08271
Defendant:
Kirell Francis Bettis
Plaintiff:
State of California and The People of the State of California
Kirell Bettis v. U.S. Department of State
as 10-17675
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS, AKA Kirell Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
BETTIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2010mc00607
Petitioner:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BETTIS v. US DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2010cv01398
Plaintiff:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
