Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Doe et al v. County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2026cv13366
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, Rhonda Collins, Bonnie MacAskill and others
Plaintiff:
John MW Doe, John TA Doe, John KS2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2026cv12938
Plaintiff:
M.D. Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, M.D. Gregory Dumanian, M.D. Jason Ko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yankelevich et al v. USI Insurance Services, LLC
as 1:2026cv26776
Plaintiff:
Tomas Yankelevich, Sofia Reca, Pil Jye Ko and others
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Baalim v. Hayward
as 4:2026cv01536
Petitioner:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Respondent:
Nate Hayward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In re: Larry Thomas, Jr.
as 26-13240
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
PETER D. LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Ko v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03150
Plaintiff:
Joelino Ko
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
