Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tornquist v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tornquist
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, County of Minnehaha, City of Sioux Falls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DeCory v. Noem
as 5:2022ct03016
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Merrick B. Garland, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rindahl v. Noem et al
as 4:2020cv04176
Defendant:
M. Liedholt, L. Lenter, A. Madsen and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04136
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Coon et al v. Ravensborg et al
as 4:2020cv04132
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Power, Eric J. Coon and Eric James Coon
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, State of South Dakota and Jason Ravensborg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brende v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2019cv04135
Respondent:
Governor Kristi Noem, Warden Darin Young, State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Brende
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Olivares v. Mark Vargo, et al
as 14-3713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Luis Olivares
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Vargo, Federal States Attorney, Neil Fulton, Brendon Johnson and others
Olivares v. Vargo et al
as 5:2014cv05055
Plaintiff:
Luis Olivares
Defendant:
Mark Vargo, Niel Fulton, Brendon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
