Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Snider v. McKeehan et al
as 4:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
McKeehan, Nichtman, Jennifer Herrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peele v. Rapp et al
as 3:2013cv01854
Petitioner:
Tyrone Peele
Respondent:
Rapp, Kalski and PA State Attorney General
Defendant:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloan v. Chambers et al
as 3:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
Christopher Chambers, Shellenberger, Ellenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. COURTIER et al
as 3:2011cv02268
Plaintiff:
Ravanna Spencer
Defendant:
Donald Kelchner , David Patton , Teresa Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Krompt et al
as 3:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Sharif Jones
Defendant:
Christian Krompt and Edward Kalsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, John A. Palakovich, Donald Kelchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravanna Spencer v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-2692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, DONALD KELCHER, RICK SOUTHERS and others
SPENCER v. COURTIER et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
LANCE COURTIER, JEFFERY A. BEARD, DONALD KELCHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, DONALD KELCHER, DAVID PATTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
