Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Patel v. United States District Court for the District of Montana, Helena
as 24-635
Petitioner:
RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Patel v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, United States President, ALL CABINET OFFICERS and others
Ajaero v. Obama
as 23-8117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. AJAERO
Defendant / Appellee:
Former President BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY R. CLINTON, President JOE BIDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT - 47TH PRECINCT
Scott v. Harris
as 23-3881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS
Zelesnik v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Richard Cordray, Fifth Third Bank and others
WILSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sadigh v. Putin et al
as 1:2023cv03247
Plaintiff:
Jillbert Sadigh
Defendant:
Vladimar Mirovich Putin, Vadim Krasnoselsky and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dickson v. Biden et al
as 8:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, Gilbert Cisneros, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv10291
Plaintiff:
Sam Thomas
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and others
CEASER v. HARRIS
as 1:2022cv03820
Plaintiff:
OSCAR CEASER
Defendant:
KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
