Cases 41 - 50 of 1,119
KANG v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01889
Petitioner:
WENFEI KANG
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bun Chung et al v. The Royal Care, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07962
Plaintiff:
Myung Bun Chung and Sun Ok Kang
Defendant:
The Royal Care, Inc.
Young v. Custer. et al.
as 1:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Sidney Kang
Defendant:
Custer and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins Jr. v. Panorama Towers Condo Unit Owners, Dennis Kariger et al
as 2:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
Preston D. Perkins Jr. and Preston D. Perkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Panorama Towers Condo Unit Owners, Dennis Kariger, Lucky Lact LLC, Tony S. Cercy, Cleanmax, Inc., Craig Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GARZON v. EXICURE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20912
Plaintiff:
DIEGO GARZON
Defendant:
EXICURE, INC., PAUL KANG, JIYOUNG HWANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
