Cases 1 - 10 of 13
George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall
as 16-6838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina and KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina
Cleveland v. Hall et al
as 6:2015cv04384
Plaintiff:
George Cleveland, III
Defendant:
Daniel D Hall and Karen C Ratigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hill et al
as 6:2014cv03731
Plaintiff:
Robert B Campbell
Defendant:
D Garrison Hill and Karen C Ratigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Lester v. Karen Ratigan
as 12-6661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN C. RATIGAN, State Assistant Attorney General
Steve Lester v. Karen Ratigan
as 12-6143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General
Lester v. Ratigan
as 4:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Steve Lester
Defendant:
Karen C Ratigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Ratigan
as 4:2011cv02995
Plaintiff:
Steve Lester
Defendant:
Karen C Ratigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. McCall et al
as 8:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Latimer
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Karen C Ratigan, C Victor Pyle, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Latimer v. Michael McCall
as 10-7727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL EDWIN LATIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution, KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General, LARRY R. PATTERSON, Judge and others
Michael McKeown v. Karen Ratigan
as 10-7639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCKEOWN
Defendant:
JOHN W. MCINTOSH, Chief Deputy Attorney General, HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General, DONALD JOHN ZELENKA, Assistant Deputy Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General, RODNEY WADE RICHEY, C. DENTON MATTHEWS, Assistant Solicitor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
