Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Armoni Johnson v. McGinley, et al
as 22-3288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MCGINLEY, DEPUTY LUSCAVAGE, MAJOR MIRACHI and others
Hubert v. Luscavage et al
as 3:2021cv01523
Plaintiff:
James Hubert
Defendant:
Anthony Luscavage, Karen Merritt-Scully, Nicole Boguslaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Brown
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman, Travis Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 1:2020cv02454
Defendant:
Karen Merritt-Scully, Sargeant Burns, Warden John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2020cv05843
Defendant:
KAREN MERRITT-SCULLY, THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. Moclock et al
as 3:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Trisha Kelley, Superintendent McGinley, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Enrico Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeShields v. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Commonwealth, Department of Corrections, Kyle Confer and Karen Merritt Scully
Plaintiff:
Robert DeShields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. McGinley et al
as 4:2018cv01793
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hickey
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Denise Austeel, Renee Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeShields v. Moclock et al
as 1:2018cv01709
Defendant:
Karen Merritt-Scully and Dr. Michael Moclock
Plaintiff:
Robert DeShields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANZA v. MOCLOCK et al
as 3:2017cv01318
Plaintiff:
ENRICO F. LANZA, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. MOCLOCK, KAREN (MERRITT) SCULLY, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
