Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith v. Twin County Regional Healthcare et al
as 7:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smith
Defendant:
Twin County Regional Healthcare, Four Unnamed Doctors and Nurses of Twin County Regional Healthcare, Karl R. Hade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Hade et al
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fuller
Defendant:
Karl R. Hade, Jonathan E. Green and E. Elizabeth Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Hade et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Karl R. Hade and Jacqueline C. Smith
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Harris v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2021cv00096
Defendant:
United States District Court, Thomas R. Cahill, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Elliott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Herrington v. Elizabeth McClanahan
as 20-2000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD HERRINGTON, STEPHANIE BLANCHARD, LAURA JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH A. MCCLANAHAN, Acting in her official capacity as Supreme Court of Va. Judge, KARL R. HADE, Acting in his individual and official capacity as Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of VA., UNNAMED/UNKNOWN CLERKS, Acting in their individual and official capacity as Stafford Circuit Clerks and others
Mark Downey v. William Barr
as 19-1807
Defendant / Appellee:
BELFOR HOLDINGS, INC., STEPHEN ALEXANDER MACISAAC, Arlington County Attorney, BENJAMIN SCRIBNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DOWNEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
