Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC v. RUFF et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC and BEUTLER ENTERPRISES, INC doing business as BEUTLER INK
Defendant:
RHIANNON RUFF, Jennifer Karn, Sheri Cook-Sandve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Karns v. Bonawits et al
as 3:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Chirstlynn Karns
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Alan Bonawits, Sgt. Jason Height, Officer John Bevilaqua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adlife Marketing & Communications Co. v. Karns Prime and Fancy Food Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Adlife Marketing & Communications Co.
Defendant:
Fry Communications, Inc. and Karns Prime and Fancy Food Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pellot v. Litz et al
as 1:2020cv01867
Plaintiff:
Christian Ayala Pellot
Defendant:
Michael L. Ott, Tina Litz and Robert Karns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Litz et al
as 1:2020cv01837
Defendant:
Michael Ott, Robert Karns and Tina Litz
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KARNS v. M & T BANK CORPORATION
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
M & T BANK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. KARNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
