Cases 1 - 10 of 25
HUTTON v. LARSEN et al
as 5:2024cv00685
Defendant:
GENIE WINN, JERRY BOWEN, LYNDA LOVELAND and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Defendant:
TERRY INGRAM, LACHELLE BULLARD, GARY HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PIERCE v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
KATE MCNAIRY PIERCE
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Crissinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Nikee Kate Crissinger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Parks v. Heckard
as 5:2023hc02063
Petitioner:
Maurice Montrae Parks
Respondent:
Kating Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kate Lindsey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN v. POOLE et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and PAMELA LOCKLEAR
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH TREMAYNE BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
