Cases 1 - 10 of 53
McLemore v. Holt
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wesley McLemore
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Bowen et al
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Solomon L. Henderson
Defendant:
Billy Bowen, David Martinez, Life Tech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Bowen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Billy Bowen, David Martinez, LifeTech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracy v. Dunn, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles William Bracy, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Cassandra Conway, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner, J. Caffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allums v. Holt (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Clarence Allums
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Golson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Theodore Sparks
Defendant:
Carolyn Golson and Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Shaddrick Vaughn
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kathy Holt and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Shaddrick Vaughn
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kathy Holt and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
