Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bruni v. Sheehan et al
as 9:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carl Bruni
Defendant:
Kathy M. Sheehan, Dixon, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covington Specialty Insurance v. Potter
as 21-2618
Plaintiff:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Indian Lookout Country Club, Inc., Francis Potter, individually, DBA Indian Lookout Country Club, Inc., Antoinette Potter, individually, DBA Indian Lookout Country Club, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathy M. Snyder and Jeremy T. Uhll
Covington Specialty Insurance v. Potter
as 21-2570
Plaintiff:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Francis Potter, individually, DBA Indian Lookout Country Club, Inc., Antoinette Potter, individually, DBA Indian Lookout Country Club, Inc., Harley Rendezvous Classic, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathy M. Snyder and Jeremy T. Uhll
Covington Specialty Insurance Company v. Potter et al
as 1:2020cv00613
Plaintiff:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Antoinette Potter, Jeremy T. Uhll, Francis Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Romero v. Manhattan And Bronx Surface Tr
as 20-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Andre, on behalf of a class of employees employed with the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, MTA Bus Company, and MTA Headquarters, Lester Daniels, on behalf of a class of employees employed with the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, MTA Bus Company, and MTA Headquarters, Roberta Leftenant, on behalf of a class of employees employed with the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, MTA Bus Company, and MTA Headquarters and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and MTA Headquarters
Defendant:
MTA Bus Company
J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc. v. Beth Van Doren
as 20-444
Plaintiff:
Peter F. Mhina, President, J & W Investor, E.E.M., Minor Child, Second V.P. and J & W Investor, Kathy M. Mhina, Treasurer and J & W Investor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Colavita, City of Syracuse Police Detective and David Buske, Syracuse Police Detective
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, Keybank N.A., Citizens Bank Vice President of Security, AKA John Cruse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James P. Mhina, C.E.O. of J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc.
J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc. v. Beth Van Doren
as 18-2488
Plaintiff:
J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc., Marie K. Mhina, First V.P. and J & W Investor, E.E.M., Minor Child, Second V.P. and J & W Investor and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James P. Mhina, C.E.O. of J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Beth Van Doren, Assistant District Attorney for Onondaga County, Anthony Collavita, City of Syracuse Police Detective and David Buske, Syracuse Police Detective
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse and others
J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc. v. Beth Van Doren
as 16-3504
Plaintiff:
J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc., Marie K. Mhina, First V.P. and J & W Investor, E.E.M., Minor Child, Second V.P. and J & W Investor and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James P. Mhina, C.E.O. of J & W Trading & Leasing, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Collavita, City of Syracuse Police Detective, David Buske, Syracuse Police Detective, Woodhaven Apartments, sued in its capacity as a legal entity and others
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse and others
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01032
Plaintiff:
Kathy M. King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
J. & W. Trading and Leasing Inc. et al v. State of New York et al
as 5:2015cv00327
Plaintiff:
J. & W. Trading and Leasing Inc., James P. Mhina, Peter F. Mhina and others
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Onondaga, Beth Van Doren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
