Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Gregory Bartko v. Michael Goetz, et al
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETZ, Administrator of the Attorney Grievance Commission, DINA P. DAJANI, Former Senior Counsel to the Attorney Grievance Commission, MARK A. ARMITAGE, Executive Director of the Attorney Discipline Board and others
Harmon et al v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
I. H., S. H., Teresa M. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Goodwin, Stephanie Willis, David Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kiebler v. Northville Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv12801
Plaintiff:
Sean Kiebler
Defendant:
Northville Public Schools, Katie Booth, David Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gibson, Sr v. Abate et al
as 2:2023cv12442
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gibson, Sr
Defendant:
Nicholas Abate, William Dobson, David Uhl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Kuzyk et al
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Davis
Defendant:
Jason Kuzyk, Fruitport, Township of, Tokio Marine HCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
