Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Nelson v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nelson and Rosalie I Nelson
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez, Idaho State Board of Correction, Idaho Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Douglas Bennett v. California Via Calif Dept of Corrections & Rehab et al
as 5:2012cv02277
Defendant:
Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-15865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Prison Operations and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, Commissary Service Provider
Dennison v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02294
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moynihan v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 2:2011cv01836
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moynihan v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 2:2011cv01830
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-16882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, GEO GROUP INCORPORATED, COMPASS GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Prince v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01250
Plaintiff:
Wayne Prince, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Placzek v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Thomas Placzek
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claxton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01257
Plaintiff:
Richard William Claxton
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
