Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
as 22-7384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Thompson v. Mr. Locklear
as 15-7227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, MR. HOLMES, Assistant Superintendent, SGT. SIDBERRY and others
Thompson v. Locklear et al
as 5:2015ct03018
Plaintiff:
Darrell Thompson
Defendant:
Mr. Locklear, Mr. Holmes, Sgt. Sidberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Boozel, et al
as 8:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Stephon Prather
Defendant:
S. Boozel, D. Donaldson, Keefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Arnald et al
as 1:2013cv02560
Plaintiff:
Dwayne McDonald
Defendant:
K. Arnald, Sgt. Gordon, Officer Keefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Wimbush v. Officer Keefer
as 13-6505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE WIMBUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KEEFER, OFFICER KIFER, SERGEANT MARSH and others
McCall v. Warden
as 1:2012cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah McCall
Defendant:
Warden, Smith, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmanuel Sewell v. J. Stouffer
as 12-6700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, RICHARD R. GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
WARDEN, STEPHEN Z. MEEHAN, JOSEPH B. TETRAULT and others
Wimbush v. Keefer et al
as 1:2012cv00523
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wimbush
Defendant:
Officer Keefer, Officer Kifer, Sgt. Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
