Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Long et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Keith Long and Megan Long
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Foster v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Keith Foster
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parker v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wright v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01584
Petitioner:
Keith Wright
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carnes v. USA
as 4:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Keith L Carnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McKay v. RBM Partners LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Keith McKay
Defendant:
RBM Partners LLC doing business as Chez Paree, Jason Hams and Sinetria Staples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Pilarski et al v. Hammann
as 4:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Keith Pilarski and Linda Pilarski
Defendant:
Chief Christopher Hammann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
