Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JOHNSON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
CHIEF KEITH BROOKS, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Acting Sherifff KEITH BROOKS, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and Sheriff JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH ALAN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICKARD v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS, CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv01767
Defendant:
Officer Erickson, Lt Artus, Nurse Amy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. BENTON et al
as 3:2018cv00082
Defendant:
OFFICER MARSHALL, CORRECT HEALTH SERVICES, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, KEITH BROOKS, MONK and others
Plaintiff:
MONTREZ TIRELL GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITED et al v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE WHITED, JOHN KELSEY CAIN, VI, JOHN CHRISTOPHER CALHOUN, II and others
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, KEITH BROOKS, MONK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Brooks v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50422
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT KEITH BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Brooks v. Stephen
as 7:2014cv00102
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Brooks
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv03013
Petitioner:
Keith Brooks
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch , Bobby Bonner and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
