Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Melisa Mays, et al v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 17-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISA MAYS, individually and as next friend of three minor children, MICHAEL MAYS, JACQUELINE PEMBERTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, Governor, in his official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, for prospective relief only, DANIEL WYANT and others
Mays et al v Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv11480
Plaintiff:
Melissa Mays , Michael Mays , Jacqueline Pemberton and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Andrews & Newnam, Inc. and Leo A. Daly Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBER v. YONOS
as 2:2016cv00904
Petitioner:
AMY WEBER
Respondent:
KEITH JOHN KEITH YONOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays, individually and as next friend of three minor children et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2015cv14002
Plaintiff:
Melisa Mays, individually and as next friend of three minor children , Michael Mays , Jacqueline Pemberton and others
Defendant:
Governor Rick Snyder , Michigan, State of , Daniel Wyant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. San Juan County Commissioners et al
as 1:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
Bobby R Yates
Defendant:
San Juan County Commissioners, Jack Fortner, Tony Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Anderson, Keith John v. Ea Corrnl Inst, et al
as 08-7011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith John Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Eastern Correctional Institution and BGF
ANDERSON v. MOTHERWAY
as 1:2007cv00517
Plaintiff:
KEITH JOHN ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH E. MOTHERWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al.,
as 1:2007cv00510
Plaintiff:
KEITH JOHN ANDERSON
Defendant:
EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and B.G.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Motherway
as 8:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Keith John Anderson
Defendant:
Joseph E. Motherway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
