Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Jones v. Michaud et al
as 1:2008cv00835
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Jones
Respondent:
David L. Michaud and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Michaud et al
as 1:2008cv00785
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Jones
Respondent:
David L. Michaud and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williamson v. Keith Jones et al.
as 2:2008cv02199
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Williamson
Defendant:
Keith Jones, Moore, Mark Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker v. Donald et al
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
David Paul Baker
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Thomas Ammons, Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Schofield et al
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conway Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Thomas Ammons, Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Metts et al
as 4:2007cv03954
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
James R Metts, Lexington County Sheriffs Department, James Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rodriguez v. Ammons et al
as 1:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Thomas Ammons, Marty Allen, B. Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Akin v. Harrelson et al
as 1:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Akin, Jr.
Defendant:
Donnie Harrelson, Delwin Partain, Linda Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Ammons et al
as 1:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Thomas Ammons and Keith Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
