Cases 11 - 20 of 105
O'Donnell v. Lamas et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
KELLEY O'DONNELL
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF (PENNSYLVANIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'DONNELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04126
Plaintiff:
KELLY O'DONNELL, ANGELA BONNANO-RICHTER and KELLEY O'DONNELL
Defendant:
DANIEL R. STEVENSON, THURGOOD MATTHEWS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Lamas et al
as 4:2021cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelley O'Donnell
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas, The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zguro v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00898
Defendant:
Theodore W. Johnson, Trisha Kelley and Thomas McGinley
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Zguro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIGER v. KELLEY
as 1:2021cv07080
Petitioner:
AARON DALE CRAIGER
Respondent:
DAVID KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ansley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Defendant:
Ms. Learn, Unit Manager Dunn, Security Lt. Stuvola and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence O. Ansley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. KELLEY et al
as 3:2021cv04565
Defendant:
NURSE NEAL WEST, C.O.R. G. KELLEY, C.O.R. W. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Supt. Smith, C.O. Kemmel, C.O. Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WITT v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2020cv14678
Defendant:
SIDNEY GIDDONS, RICHARD SMITH, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LOURENZO WITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
