Cases 41 - 50 of 543
Small v. Key
as 2:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
Kelly E Small
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Osler
as 3:2022cv05968
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Kelli E Osler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Steve Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03148
Plaintiff:
Kelli Anthony
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ferguson v. Spokane Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Ferguson
Defendant:
Spokane superior Court, Callalily Q Ferguson, Jared B Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz et al
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Defendant:
Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corporation, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dos Santos v. Unite Here Local 8 et al
as 2:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Claudio Morais Dos Santos
Defendant:
Unite Here Local 8, Natalie Kelly and Jacob Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
