Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Kelly-Johnson v. Holguin-Kelly
as 1:2024at01030
Defendant:
Desiree Christine Holguin-Kelly
Plaintiff:
Ms. Henrietta Jane Kelly-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Kelly-Johnson v. Holguin-Kelly
as 1:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Jane Kelly-Johnson
Defendant:
Desiree Christine Holguin-Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
FARAFONOV et al v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2024cv02182
Defendant:
KELLY-JOHNSON, S SOWELL, KERRY FORESTAL and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREI FARAFONOV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson
as 1:2024cv07245
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. County of Mendocino et al
as 1:2024cv07250
Defendant:
Deputy Jesus Lopez-Gonzales, Sheriff Matthew Kendall and Deputy Michael Jensen
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mendocino County et al
as 1:2024cv07220
Defendant:
Mendocino County, Michael Jensen, Sheriff Matthew Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gehlaut v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-1741
Plaintiff:
DHARMVIR GEHLAUT
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and KELLY JOHNSON, former Principal of the Baccalaureate School of Global Education
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05248
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
