Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Welsh v. Lubbock County
as 22-11049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant / Appellee:
Lubbock County, Kelly Rowe, Sheriff, C. Scott, Chief Jail Administrator and others
Wojtowicz v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Donn Wojtowicz
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Christine Marquez and Mr. NFN Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Garcia et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Julian Ramirez
Defendant:
Roberto Garcia and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. Paxton et al
as 5:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Steven Weinert and Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant:
John B. Scott, Sheriff Chris White, Sheriff Kelly Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Garcia et al
as 5:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Julian Ramirez and Julian E Ramirez
Defendant:
Roberto Garcia and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olivarez v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Jai Olivarez
Defendant:
Lubbock County Courthouse, Lubbock County Detention Center and Sheriff Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jimenez v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jimenez
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Kelly Rowe
as 5:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Darene Brooks
Defendant:
FNU 5:22-CV-221 Fair and Sergio Ordonez
Respondent:
Lubbock County Detention Center and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Edward J Wilson
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Woodson v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Marcus D Woodson
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
